The first diamond open-access peer-reviewed journal of catastrophe research

RETRACTION NOTE: Validation and Comparison of U.S. Loss Estimates from Catastrophe Flood Models

Volume 04, article 08
September 16, 2026
Author(s): Dominick Dusseau1, Zachary Zobel1, Christopher R Schwalm1
1Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, MA
Tags:
DOI: 10.63024/982t-jh37

Retraction to: Journal of Catastrophe Risk and Resilience https://doi.org/10.63024/k6yh-a2v6, published February 2026

The authors have retracted this article.

Following publication, the authors proactively identified an error in Table 5, where burn rate data for the FPFLM and KCC models were inadvertently sourced from an incorrect table. During the subsequent post-publication review of these corrections, it became apparent that the methodological framework comparing a population-wide catastrophe model with NFIP claims data did not adequately account for the low insurance take-up rate and the resulting risk selection bias within the NFIP dataset. Because these methodological issues may affect some of the core conclusions of the paper, the authors are retracting the article to undertake a comprehensive revision. Dominick Dusseau, Zachary Zobel, and Christopher Schwalm agree to this retraction.

Article Citation Details

Dominick Dusseau1, Zachary Zobel1, Christopher R Schwalm1
1Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, MA
, RETRACTION NOTE: Validation and Comparison of U.S. Loss Estimates from Catastrophe Flood Models, Journal of Catastrophe Risk and Resilience, 2026. 10.63024/982t-jh37

Total
0
Shares
Related Posts
A close-up of a worker inspecting data on a screen.
Read More

Insights into Industrial Catastrophe Risk Climate Peril Modelling, and Cross-Sector Opportunities for Progress

Authors Jayanta Guin, Suz Tolwinski-Ward, Charles Jackson, Boyko Dodov, and Roger Grenier Verisk Extreme Event Solutions, Boston, MA introduce the catastrophe risk modelling industry, describe the history and latest developments in state-of-the-art cat models within their firm, and discuss how further collaboration across sectors could contribute to improvements in the estimation of climate-driven risk.
Read More

Supershear Earthquakes – An Insurance Blind Spot

Luke Wedmore and William Sturgeon, research analysts at MS Amlin, review the evidence and impact of supershear earthquakes and discuss how the effects of this type of earthquakes are currently missing from seismic design codes, national seismic hazard models, and catastrophe models used by the (re)insurance industry.